Our Solutions · AI Automation & Analysis

Physician-supervised AI automation and analysis

AI agents do the producing and the analysing; the physician decides what gets published, who gets contacted and which opportunity is pursued.

Shared principle

A multi-agent pipeline, a single human approval gate

Agents that check each otherSeveral AI systems assess the same work independently; conflicts are listed, and the unresolved ones go to a human.
Human approval gateNo content, call or recommendation leaves without physician approval.
Output with visible sourcesEvery draft and every score carries the source it rests on.

Content

AI Content Studio — a pipeline that runs every morning

Live · daily

A pipeline that scans current sources every morning and drafts evidence-based content: articles, short-video scripts and social-media packages. AI drafts, the physician approves; nothing is published without approval. The articles and clinical claim cards on this site are fed by this pipeline.

Evidence firstDrafts arrive with a source list; sentences without a source are removed.
Multi-formatThe same evidence becomes an article, a video and a machine-readable claim.
Studio page →
Scancurrent sources
DraftAI
Physician reviewevery morning
Publisharticle · video

Communication

Voice AI Agent — transparent automated calling

Prototype

A follow-up agent that calls in a natural voice, states clearly that it is an AI, and turns the conversation into a structured report. The call list, opening script and report format are set by a human; the agent asks only the agreed questions. Adaptable across domains.

Declared identityIt says it is an AI in the first sentence and explains recording and data handling.
Structured reportThe call condenses into a short summary and flagged items for a human to read.
Agent page →

Transparent calling

Calldeclares it is AI
Conversationstructured
Reportto a human

Analysis

Market Analysis & Decision Support — a multi-criteria opportunity portfolio

Completed

A system that turns a catalogue of several hundred items into a prioritised opportunity portfolio with multi-criteria scoring. Clinical value, market gap, feasibility and regulation are scored separately; every score shows its source, and data that cannot be verified is marked "not found" rather than invented.

Cross-readingWhen independent research strands converge the finding is strengthened; when they do not, the conflict is written down.
Weaknesses on recordEvery recommendation comes with the scenario in which it would be wrong.
Analysis page →

100-point multi-criteria score

Clinical value
86
Market gap
72
Feasibility
64
Regulation
48

Automation for your organization

We are open to talking with organizations that want content, communication and analysis pipelines built under physician supervision.